000			01993nam a2200265Ia 4500
001			3606
003			OSt
005			20241007150611.0
008			231005s9999 xx 000 0 und d
020			_a9788671013291
040			_c--
245		0	_aOn Neutrality: _bO Neutralnosti _c/ Jelena Vesić; Rachel O'Reilly; Vladimir Jerić Vlidi
260			_aBelgrade; _bMuseum of Contemporary Art; _c2016
300			_a32p; _c21x15cm
490			_aNon-aligned Modernisms / Nesvrstani Modernizmi _v#6
520			_aNeutrality as a political concept has existed as long as there has been warfare. At its simplest, neutrality means not taking part in a war, or, in more durational terms, to remain uncontaminated by great rivalries. But with any second glance through its conflicting legacies, the terminological negativity of the Neutral gets quite complex — juxtapolitical and generative — as it continues to be utilized across progressive and conservative, legal-normative and revolutionary identifications. It is often said that in international law there is no term more complex, entangled and subtle than the one of neutrality. Within the history of Non-Aligned Movement (NAM), we locate Neutrality as not a static term, nor a petrified legal institution, but rather a dynamic category of position taking. Our research experiment tracks through Neutrality as a political discourse of comportment, as a strategy, and as a historic geopolitical phenomenon, constitutive of philosophies of war and peace, or of inequality in conflict. We consider the NAM experiments in Active Neutrality as key element of both the genealogy of the very term of Neutrality and what the movement was about.
546			_aEnglish; Serbian
648			_a21st century _91391
650			_aInternational relations _91392
650			_aN81-390 Study and teaching. Research _91393
700			_aJelena Vesic _91394
700			_aRachel O'Reilly _91395
700			_aVladimir Jeric Vlidi _91396
942			_cBK _2lcc
999			_c3606 _d3606